<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New York Business Litigation Attorney &#124; New York Breach of Contract Attorney &#187; labor law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/tag/labor-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Commission Salesman Not Entitled to Recover Statutory Damages, Attorney&#8217;s Fees on Breach of Contract Claim, NY Court Holds</title>
		<link>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/commission-salesman-not-entitled-to-recover-attorneys-fees-on-breach-of-contract-claim-ny-court-holds/</link>
		<comments>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/commission-salesman-not-entitled-to-recover-attorneys-fees-on-breach-of-contract-claim-ny-court-holds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of fiduciary duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consequential damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piercing corporate veil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unjust enrichment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaid commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaid wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s edition of the New York Law Journal, there was an interesting decision from a New York County trial court in a breach of contract case, Garber v. Inter Capital Resources LLC. In this case, the plaintiff was a commission salesman who sought to recover the commissions that he purportedly earned &#8211; but was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s edition of the New York Law Journal, there was an interesting decision from a New York County trial court in a <a href="http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/at-will-employees-breach-of-oral-contract-claim-for-unpaid-bonuses-survives-dismissal/">breach of contract</a> case, <a href="http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2010FEB/3001171892008002SCIV.pdf">Garber v. Inter Capital Resources LLC</a>. In this case, the plaintiff was a commission salesman who sought to recover the commissions that he purportedly earned &#8211; but was never paid &#8211; for the second and third quarters of calendar year 2008.</p>
<p>The underlying, <a href="http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2009JUN/3001171892008001SCIV.pdf">earlier decision</a> from which this more recent decision stems is even more important, because it serves an important reminder to attorneys litigating breach of contract and breach of employment agreement cases: <em>make sure that your causes of action are not only supported with specific factual allegations, but that they are also separately and distinctly pled</em>.</p>
<p>In short, since the Court found that the plaintiff had not particularized any specific violations of the Labor Law, but had only set forth enough facts to sustain a common law (as opposed to statutory) breach of contract claim, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover statutory damages under the Labor Law, and therefore, the Court dismissed the plaintiff&#8217;s claims seeking to recover liquidated damages and attorney&#8217;s fees based upon the defendants&#8217; alleged <a href="http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/at-will-employees-breach-of-oral-contract-claim-for-unpaid-bonuses-survives-dismissal/">violations of Labor Law § 198 (1-a)</a>, stating: &#8220;Breach of contract claims do not give rise to the relief afforded under <a href="http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?rs=CLB3.0&amp;vr=2.0&amp;cite=82+N.Y.2d+457" target="_top">Labor Law §198 (1-a). See Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub &amp; Co., Inc., 82 NY2d 457, 464 (1993)</a>; <a href="http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?rs=CLB3.0&amp;vr=2.0&amp;cite=10+N.Y.3d+609" target="_top">Pachter v. Bernard Hodes Group, 10 NY3d 609 (2008)</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>One final note: since the plaintiff failed to allege enough factual particulars, his attempt to <a href="http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/piercing-the-corporate-veil-critical-facts-that-you-will-need-to-prove-your-case/">pierce the defendants&#8217; corporate veil</a> failed as well.
<p><font color="#B4B4B4" size="-2">Post Footer automatically generated by <a href="http://www.freetimefoto.com/add_post_footer_plugin_wordpress" style="color: #B4B4B4; text-decoration:underline;">Add Post Footer Plugin</a> for wordpress.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/commission-salesman-not-entitled-to-recover-attorneys-fees-on-breach-of-contract-claim-ny-court-holds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Reason Why, Under NY Law, You May Want To Hire A General Contractor Rather Than A Construction Manager</title>
		<link>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/one-reason-why-under-ny-law-you-may-want-to-hire-a-general-contractor-rather-than-a-construction-manager/</link>
		<comments>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/one-reason-why-under-ny-law-you-may-want-to-hire-a-general-contractor-rather-than-a-construction-manager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[breach of contract new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business litigation new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contractual indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a negligence case that I recently defended, my client, a real estate developer, opted to hire a construction manager rather than a general contractor to oversee the development of this New York City building. Apparently, one of the main distinctions between a general contractor and a construction manager is the level of responsibility they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a negligence case that I recently defended, my client, a real estate developer, opted to hire a construction manager rather than a general contractor to oversee the development of this New York City building. Apparently, one of the main distinctions between a general contractor and a construction manager is the level of responsibility they take for the job: while the general contractor assumes full responsibility and oversight of the construction, including the hiring and retention of subcontractors, a construction manager, by contrast, acts in an advisory capacity, and does not necessarily control or dictate the manner in which the work is performed, or hire any of the subcontractors; that remains the owner&#8217;s job.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, these distinctions have ramifications in terms of these parties&#8217; respective exposure to <a href="http://www.jonathancooperlaw.com/library/construction-accident-liability-under-new-york-law.cfm">liability for construction site accidents</a>. Unlike the site owner and a general contractor, who are both explicitly named in Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) as potentially liable parties for work site accidents, a <a href="http://www.jonathancooperlaw.com/library/construction-manager-liability-for-worksite-accidents.cfm">construction site manager&#8217;s liability for worksite accidents</a> is less certain; if he neither directs nor controls any of the work being performed, he may escape liability altogether (assuming there is no contractual indemnity), leaving the owner one less important avenue for contribution.
<p><font color="#B4B4B4" size="-2">Post Footer automatically generated by <a href="http://www.freetimefoto.com/add_post_footer_plugin_wordpress" style="color: #B4B4B4; text-decoration:underline;">Add Post Footer Plugin</a> for wordpress.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/one-reason-why-under-ny-law-you-may-want-to-hire-a-general-contractor-rather-than-a-construction-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At-Will Employees&#8217; Breach of Oral Contract Claim For Unpaid Bonuses Survives Dismissal in NY County Case</title>
		<link>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/at-will-employees-breach-of-oral-contract-claim-for-unpaid-bonuses-survives-dismissal-in-ny-county-case/</link>
		<comments>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/at-will-employees-breach-of-oral-contract-claim-for-unpaid-bonuses-survives-dismissal-in-ny-county-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at-will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of fiduciary duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of frauds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unjust enrichment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaid commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaid wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If an at-will employee resigns before they are paid their commissions, they forfeit their right to collect them, right?
Absolutely not, held a New York County trial court.
In Nichols v. SG Partners, Inc., the plaintiffs were employed by defendant as placement professionals, earning both a base salary as well as a percentage of defendant&#8217;s revenues generated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an at-will employee resigns before they are paid their commissions, they forfeit their right to collect them, right?</p>
<p>Absolutely not, held a New York County trial court.</p>
<p>In <em><a href="http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2010JAN/3001094392009001SCIV.pdf">Nichols v. SG Partners, Inc.</a>, </em>the plaintiffs were employed by defendant as placement professionals, earning both a base salary as well as a percentage of defendant&#8217;s revenues generated for placements that the plaintiffs made, or commissions. After the plaintiffs found the working conditions &#8220;intolerable,&#8221; they resigned, and requested that the defendant pay them for the commissions they had earned during their employment. Not surprisingly, the defendant ignored these requests.</p>
<p>Accordingly, the plaintiffs sued the defendants, contending that the defendants were liable for <a href="http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/identifying-whether-you-may-have-a-breach-of-contract-case/">breach of contract</a>, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and violation of New York Labor Law (&#8220;Labor Law&#8221;) §193. The defendant then promptly moved to dismiss the case, arguing, among other things, that since the plaintiffs did not have a written contract the plaintiffs&#8217; claims were barred under <a href="http://www.jonathancooperlaw.com/library/commission-agreements-finders-fees-and-the-statute-of-frauds.cfm">New York&#8217;s Statute of Frauds</a> (N.Y. Gen. Obl. Law §5-701).</p>
<p>In rejecting the defendant&#8217;s argument, the Court cited a long litany of precedent for the proposition that &#8220;[B]ecause an at-will employment relationship may be freely terminated by either party at any time for any reason or even no reason, employment agreements of this type generally do not fall under the proscription of the Statute of Frauds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Importantly, the Court also noted that if it is later found at trial that an employer willfully withheld the plaintiffs&#8217; wages, in derogation of Labor Law §198.1-a, &#8220;an additional amount as liquidated damages equal to twenty-five percent of the total amount of the wages found to be due&#8221; (Rasmussen v. Yellow River, Inc. 298 AD2d 322 [1st Dept 2002]; Wolintetz v. Island Stationary Corp., 16 Misc 3d 1133 [NY Dist Ct 2007] (withholding of payment of commissions was a willful act of retaliation for the plaintiff&#8217;s leaving the defendant&#8217;s employ)).</p>
<p>The message to employers is unmistakably clear: if you wrongfully withhold earned wages or payments due to your former employees, you do so at your own peril.
<p><font color="#B4B4B4" size="-2">Post Footer automatically generated by <a href="http://www.freetimefoto.com/add_post_footer_plugin_wordpress" style="color: #B4B4B4; text-decoration:underline;">Add Post Footer Plugin</a> for wordpress.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nysmallbusinessattorney.com/at-will-employees-breach-of-oral-contract-claim-for-unpaid-bonuses-survives-dismissal-in-ny-county-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
