Jury Finds Chemical Companies Not Liable For Environmental Contamination

Jonathan Cooper — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:37:46 +0000

Last month, a California jury dismissed from an environmental contamination lawsuit several companies that were in the chain of manufacture, distribution, and ultimate use of perchloroethylene, finding that there was insufficient evidence that these companies were responsible for the environmental contamination. During the trial, the city of Modesto, California (the plaintiff) contended that these companies were liable for the city’s tainted groundwater and contaminated soil because these chemical manufacturers had wrongfully told several local drycleaners (who were also sued by the city) that they could dispose their perc waste into Modesto’s sewer system without concern that it would contaminate the local environment or water.

Although this verdict was a setback for the City of Modesto, California (who is the plaintiff in the lawsuit), who claimed that these companies had manufactured, sold and used a defective product, and that the defendants’ mishandling and misuse of the defective product had tainted the City’s water supply, the City had previously been awarded well over $21 million in compensatory and punitive damages in their claims against defendants Dow Chemical, PPG and Vulcan Chemical.

Not suprisingly, counsel for Modesto, as well as corporate giants Down Chemical and PPG have indicated that this lawsuit is far from over, as they all intend to appeal.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

New York Business Litigation Attorney | New York Breach of Contract Attorney » environmental liability

Jury Finds Chemical Companies Not Liable For Environmental Contamination